MSIR.0973 - Revision history

JAL: mention QA test for this msg

2018-05-31T16:24:54Z

mention QA test for this msg

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:24, 31 May 2018
Line 18:		Line 18:
	</ul>		</ul>
	{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}		{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}
			<!-- SOUL.DNC.002.QA for MSIR.0973 tests -->

DCameron at 14:27, 31 May 2018

2018-05-31T14:27:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 31 May 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:MSIR.0973 skeleton}}		{{Template:MSIR.0973 skeleton}}
	<p>		<p>
	A <var>Throws</var> clause was coded in an invalid context. ~~There~~ are ~~a few scenarios where~~ this message ~~might be produced~~:		A <var>Throws</var> clause was coded in an invalid context. The following examples are amongst the possibles texts that can be displayed with this message:
	</p>		</p>
	<ul>		<ul>

JAL: misc formatting

2018-05-30T16:05:52Z

misc formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 30 May 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:MSIR.0973 skeleton}}		{{Template:MSIR.0973 skeleton}}
	<p>		<p>
	A Throws clause ~~has been~~ coded in an invalid context. There are a few scenarios where this message might be produced..		A <var>Throws</var> clause was coded in an invalid context. There are a few scenarios where this message might be produced:
	</p>		</p>
	<ul>		<ul>
	<li>A method with the special name ~~of either~~ OnThrow or OnUncaught ~~has been~~ coded with the Throws clause~~, which~~ is not allowed as it ~~would cause~~ a loop in exception handling. This ~~would produce~~ the message		<li>A method with the special name <code>OnThrow</code> or <code>OnUncaught</code> was coded with the <var>Throws</var> clause. This is not allowed, since it causes a loop in exception handling. This condition produces the following message:
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- OnThrow/OnUncaught don't allow THROWS</p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- OnThrow/OnUncaught don't allow THROWS</p></li>
	<li>a Throws clause ~~has been~~ coded specifying duplicate ~~exceptions~~ classes. This condition produces the message
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>		<li>A <var>Throws</var> clause was coded specifying duplicate exception classes. This condition produces the following message:
	<li> A Throws clause specifies ~~a class name for~~ a non-exception class. This produces the message		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p></li>
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class ''classname'' not an exception class</p>
	<li> A Throws clause specifies a base exception class, followed by ~~its~~ extension class ~~name~~. In this ~~case, either~~ the base class ~~can be specified~~, or the ~~extension~~, or the extension ~~followed by the base~~ class, but not base followed by extension. ~~Here the~~ following message is produced		<li>A <var>Throws</var> clause specifies a non-exception class. This produces the following message:
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- base class listed before extension</p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class <i>classname</i> not an exception class</p></li>

			<li>A <var>Throws</var> clause specifies a base exception class, followed by an extension of the base class. But this order is not allowed. You may specify the extension followed by the base class, or the base class alone, or the extension class alone, but <i>not</i> base followed by extension.
			The following message is produced:
			<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- base class listed before extension</p></li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	~~<p>~~
	~~<b>Response:</b>~~
	~~</p>~~
	{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}		{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}

DCameron at 15:04, 30 May 2018

2018-05-30T15:04:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 30 May 2018
Line 10:		Line 10:
	<li> A Throws clause specifies a class name for a non-exception class. This produces the message		<li> A Throws clause specifies a class name for a non-exception class. This produces the message
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class ''classname'' not an exception class</p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class ''classname'' not an exception class</p>
			<li> A Throws clause specifies a base exception class, followed by its extension class name. In this case, either the base class can be specified, or the extension, or the extension followed by the base class, but not base followed by extension. Here the following message is produced
			<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- base class listed before extension</p>
	</ul>		</ul>
	<p>		<p>

DCameron at 14:27, 30 May 2018

2018-05-30T14:27:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 30 May 2018
Line 9:		Line 9:
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>
	<li> A Throws clause specifies a class name for a non-exception class. This produces the message		<li> A Throws clause specifies a class name for a non-exception class. This produces the message
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class ~~nnn~~ not an exception class</p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class ''classname'' not an exception class</p>
	</ul>		</ul>
	<p>		<p>

DCameron at 14:23, 30 May 2018

2018-05-30T14:23:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, 30 May 2018
Line 9:		Line 9:
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>
	<li> A Throws clause specifies a class name for a non-exception class. This produces the message		<li> A Throws clause specifies a class name for a non-exception class. This produces the message
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class ~~Car~~ not an exception class</p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class nnn not an exception class</p>
	</ul>		</ul>
	<p>		<p>

DCameron at 14:22, 30 May 2018

2018-05-30T14:22:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 30 May 2018
Line 8:		Line 8:
	<li>a Throws clause has been coded specifying duplicate exceptions classes. This condition produces the message		<li>a Throws clause has been coded specifying duplicate exceptions classes. This condition produces the message
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>
			<li> A Throws clause specifies a class name for a non-exception class. This produces the message
			<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- class Car not an exception class</p>
	</ul>		</ul>
	<p>		<p>

DCameron at 14:10, 30 May 2018

2018-05-30T14:10:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 30 May 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	<li>A method with the special name of either OnThrow or OnUncaught has been coded with the Throws clause, which is not allowed as it would cause a loop in exception handling. This would produce the message		<li>A method with the special name of either OnThrow or OnUncaught has been coded with the Throws clause, which is not allowed as it would cause a loop in exception handling. This would produce the message
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- OnThrow/OnUncaught don't allow THROWS</p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- OnThrow/OnUncaught don't allow THROWS</p>
	~~</ul>~~
	<li>a Throws clause has been coded specifying duplicate exceptions classes. This condition produces the message		<li>a Throws clause has been coded specifying duplicate exceptions classes. This condition produces the message
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>
			</ul>
	<p>		<p>
	<b>Response:</b>		<b>Response:</b>
	</p>		</p>
	{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}		{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}

DCameron at 14:09, 30 May 2018

2018-05-30T14:09:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:09, 30 May 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- OnThrow/OnUncaught don't allow THROWS</p>		<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- OnThrow/OnUncaught don't allow THROWS</p>
	</ul>		</ul>
			<li>a Throws clause has been coded specifying duplicate exceptions classes. This condition produces the message
			<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- duplicate thrown class </p>
	<p>		<p>
	<b>Response:</b>		<b>Response:</b>
	</p>		</p>
	{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}		{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}

DCameron at 14:05, 30 May 2018

2018-05-30T14:05:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 30 May 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:MSIR.0973 skeleton}}		{{Template:MSIR.0973 skeleton}}
	<p>		<p>
	~~Description~~		A Throws clause has been coded in an invalid context. There are a few scenarios where this message might be produced..
	</p>		</p>
			<ul>
			<li>A method with the special name of either OnThrow or OnUncaught has been coded with the Throws clause, which is not allowed as it would cause a loop in exception handling. This would produce the message
			<p class="code>MSIR.0973: THROWS invalid -- OnThrow/OnUncaught don't allow THROWS</p>
			</ul>
	<p>		<p>
	<b>Response:</b>		<b>Response:</b>
	</p>		</p>
	{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}		{{Template:MSIR.0973 footer}}