MSIR.0213 Previous SIRFIELD (field) (type) format ((oldfmt)) differs from new value: (newfmt): Difference between revisions

From m204wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Automatically generated page update)
m (add italics)
Line 1: Line 1:
This message indicates that a SIRFIELD FORMAT or RELATE command was issued for ''''field'''', setting either the primary DATE format or the ERROR format (as indicated by ''''type'''') to ''''newfmt'''', but the format was previously set to ''''oldfmt''''.  
This message indicates that a SIRFIELD FORMAT or RELATE command was issued for '''''field''''', setting either the primary DATE format or the ERROR format (as indicated by '''''type''''') to '''''newfmt''''', but the format was previously set to '''''oldfmt'''''.  


The command is rejected.
The command is rejected.

Revision as of 21:28, 7 July 2016

This message indicates that a SIRFIELD FORMAT or RELATE command was issued for field, setting either the primary DATE format or the ERROR format (as indicated by type) to newfmt, but the format was previously set to oldfmt.

The command is rejected.


Message attributes:

RETCODEO=0Sets online return code
RETCODEB=4Sets batch (single user) return code
CLASS=EError class; the message can be suppressed with the X'04' bit setting of the MSGCTL parameter
AUDITERWrites the message with line type ER to the audit trail
COUNTIncrements the error count (ERCNT) parameter

Back to list of messages