MSIR.1029: Difference between revisions

From m204wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!--Test SOUL.DNC.014.QA in QASHR exercises at least some MSIR.1029 cases. PDS-6626 -->
<!--Test SOUL.DNC.014.QA in QASHR exercises at least some MSIR.1029 cases. PDS-6626 -->
<p>
<p>
This error typically indicates incorrect use of an attribute within an enumeration block or metod.. The following examples are among the texts that might appear with this message:
This error typically indicates incorrect use of an attribute within an enumeration block or method. The following examples are among the texts that might appear with this message:
</p>
</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li>An attribute is declared after a value declaration in an enumeration block - all attributes must be decalred before any value is declared. In this case, the following message is produced:
<li>An attribute is declared after a value declaration in an enumeration block - all attributes must be declared before any value is declared. In this case, the following message is produced:
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: attribute declared after start of values</p></li>
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: attribute declared after start of values</p></li>
<li>If an inverse is declared for an enumeration attribute without specifying the inverse method, the following message is produced:
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: Incomplete inverse attribute declaration</p></li>
<li>If an attribute is defined as datatype string, and a non-string constant value is defined, then the following message is produced:
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: attribute value must be a string constant</p>
Similar messages can be produced if there is a mismatch between a defined value and float or unicode datatypes. </li>
<li>The attribute section of a value declaration must be enclosed in parentheses, otherwise the following message is produced:
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: missing attributes section </p>
<li>If an attribute value has multiple possible inverses, implying that the value cannot be inversed uniquely, then the following message is produced:
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: Duplicate values specified for invertible attribute </p>
<li>Other possible flavours of the message include:
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: too many attributes</p>
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: name/value missing</p>
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: named attribute expected</p>
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: invalid value for an enumeration attribute</p>
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: Unicode value too long (>127 characters)</p>
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: invalid syntax</p>
<p class="code>MSIR.1029: Attribute error: too many attribute values</p>
</li>


<li>A common alias cannot be defined for a local method. In this case, the following message is produced:
<p class="code>MSIR.0986: Common alias not allowed for local method </p></li>
<li>An alias defined for a non-enhancement method must not be specified for an enhancement method, and vice versa. In this case, one of the following messages might be produced:
<p class="code>MSIR.0986: Non-enhancement local alias not allowed for enhancement method
</p>
<p class="code>MSIR.0986: Enhancement local alias not allowed for non-enhancement method </p>
<p class="code>MSIR.0986: Non-enhancement common alias not allowed for enhancement method</p>
</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>
<p>

Latest revision as of 14:10, 20 March 2019

MSIR.1029  Attribute error: token

This error typically indicates incorrect use of an attribute within an enumeration block or method. The following examples are among the texts that might appear with this message:

  • An attribute is declared after a value declaration in an enumeration block - all attributes must be declared before any value is declared. In this case, the following message is produced:

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: attribute declared after start of values

  • If an inverse is declared for an enumeration attribute without specifying the inverse method, the following message is produced:

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: Incomplete inverse attribute declaration

  • If an attribute is defined as datatype string, and a non-string constant value is defined, then the following message is produced:

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: attribute value must be a string constant

    Similar messages can be produced if there is a mismatch between a defined value and float or unicode datatypes.
  • The attribute section of a value declaration must be enclosed in parentheses, otherwise the following message is produced:

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: missing attributes section

  • If an attribute value has multiple possible inverses, implying that the value cannot be inversed uniquely, then the following message is produced:

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: Duplicate values specified for invertible attribute

  • Other possible flavours of the message include:

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: too many attributes

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: name/value missing

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: named attribute expected

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: invalid value for an enumeration attribute

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: Unicode value too long (>127 characters)

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: invalid syntax

    MSIR.1029: Attribute error: too many attribute values

Response:

Message attributes:

RETCODEO=0Sets online return code
RETCODEB=4Sets batch (single user) return code
CLASS=EError class; the message can be suppressed with the X'04' bit setting of the MSGCTL parameter
AUDITERWrites the message with line type ER to the audit trail
COUNTIncrements the error count (ERCNT) parameter
ECHODisplays the line that caused the error

Back to list of messages