M204.0773: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Automatically generated page update) |
m (add <var>'s) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<li>A field name in a SOUL statement was a null string. This is probably due to failure to initialize a %variable meant to contain the field name referred to by the corresponding %%variable. Refer to [[Using variables and values in computation#Field name variables|Field name variables]]. </li> | <li>A field name in a SOUL statement was a null string. This is probably due to failure to initialize a %variable meant to contain the field name referred to by the corresponding %%variable. Refer to [[Using variables and values in computation#Field name variables|Field name variables]]. </li> | ||
<li>A field name was not given for a DEFINE FIELD command. </li> | <li>A field name was not given for a <var>DEFINE FIELD</var> command. </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
<b>Response:</b> Correct, and try again. </p> | <b>Response:</b> Correct, and try again. | ||
</p> | |||
{{Template:M204.0773 footer}} | {{Template:M204.0773 footer}} | ||
<!-- skeleton as it was in pdf/FIELD NAME REQUIRED /--> | <!-- skeleton as it was in pdf/FIELD NAME REQUIRED /--> |
Latest revision as of 00:14, 2 March 2018
M204.0773 token name required
This message is caused by one of the following conditions:
- A field name in a SOUL statement was a null string. This is probably due to failure to initialize a %variable meant to contain the field name referred to by the corresponding %%variable. Refer to Field name variables.
- A field name was not given for a DEFINE FIELD command.
Response: Correct, and try again.
Message attributes:
RETCODEO=0 | Sets online return code |
---|---|
RETCODEB=4 | Sets batch (single user) return code |
CLASS=E | Error class; the message can be suppressed with the X'04' bit setting of the MSGCTL parameter |
AUDITER | Writes the message with line type ER to the audit trail |
COUNT | Increments the error count (ERCNT) parameter |