M204.1141: Difference between revisions

From m204wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Automatically generated page update)
 
m (add <code>s)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:M204.1141 skeleton}}
{{Template:M204.1141 skeleton}}
<P>The CLASS specification given in a PROCEDURE command does not agree with the class of an existing secured procedure. </P>
<P>
<p><b>Response:</b> Reissue the command with the proper class specification, or delete the existing procedure before defining the new procedure. </p>
The <code>CLASS</code> specification given in a <var>PROCEDURE</var> command does not agree with the class of an existing secured procedure. </P>
<p>
<b>Response:</b> Reissue the command with the proper class specification, or delete the existing procedure before defining the new procedure.  
</p>
{{Template:M204.1141 footer}}
{{Template:M204.1141 footer}}
<!-- skeleton as it was in pdf/INVALID CLASS SPECIFICATION /-->
<!-- skeleton as it was in pdf/INVALID CLASS SPECIFICATION /-->

Latest revision as of 21:24, 5 March 2018

M204.1141  Invalid class specification

The CLASS specification given in a PROCEDURE command does not agree with the class of an existing secured procedure.

Response: Reissue the command with the proper class specification, or delete the existing procedure before defining the new procedure.

Message attributes:

RETCODEO=0Sets online return code
RETCODEB=4Sets batch (single user) return code
CLASS=EError class; the message can be suppressed with the X'04' bit setting of the MSGCTL parameter
AUDITERWrites the message with line type ER to the audit trail
COUNTIncrements the error count (ERCNT) parameter

Back to list of messages