M204.0773: Difference between revisions

From m204wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Automatically generated page update)
 
m (add <var>'s)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
<li>A field name in a SOUL statement was a null string. This is probably due to failure to initialize a %variable meant to contain the field name referred to by the corresponding %%variable. Refer to [[Using variables and values in computation#Field name variables|Field name variables]]. </li>
<li>A field name in a SOUL statement was a null string. This is probably due to failure to initialize a %variable meant to contain the field name referred to by the corresponding %%variable. Refer to [[Using variables and values in computation#Field name variables|Field name variables]]. </li>


<li>A field name was not given for a DEFINE FIELD command. </li>
<li>A field name was not given for a <var>DEFINE FIELD</var> command. </li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>
<p>
<b>Response:</b> Correct, and try again. </p>
<b>Response:</b> Correct, and try again.  
</p>
{{Template:M204.0773 footer}}
{{Template:M204.0773 footer}}
<!-- skeleton as it was in pdf/FIELD NAME REQUIRED /-->
<!-- skeleton as it was in pdf/FIELD NAME REQUIRED /-->

Latest revision as of 00:14, 2 March 2018

M204.0773  token name required

This message is caused by one of the following conditions:

  • A field name in a SOUL statement was a null string. This is probably due to failure to initialize a %variable meant to contain the field name referred to by the corresponding %%variable. Refer to Field name variables.
  • A field name was not given for a DEFINE FIELD command.

Response: Correct, and try again.

Message attributes:

RETCODEO=0Sets online return code
RETCODEB=4Sets batch (single user) return code
CLASS=EError class; the message can be suppressed with the X'04' bit setting of the MSGCTL parameter
AUDITERWrites the message with line type ER to the audit trail
COUNTIncrements the error count (ERCNT) parameter

Back to list of messages