M204.2033: Difference between revisions

From m204wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Automatically generated page update)
 
m (add <var>'s)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


<P>
<P>
An IN ORDER clause was coded on a FOR loop that is in remote file context. [[PQO]] does not support the IN ORDER clause. </P>
An <var>In Order</var> clause was coded on a <var>For</var> loop that is in remote file context. [[PQO]] does not support the <var>In Order</var> clause. </P>
<p>
<p>
<b>Response:</b> Correct the program. Use <code>SORT RECORD KEYS</code> to obtain the desired ordering. </p>
<b>Response:</b> Correct the program. Use <code>Sort Record keys</code> to obtain the desired ordering.  
</p>
{{Template:M204.2033 footer}}
{{Template:M204.2033 footer}}
<!-- skeleton as it was in pdf/"IN ORDER" NOT VALID ON REMOTE FILE /-->
<!-- skeleton as it was in pdf/"IN ORDER" NOT VALID ON REMOTE FILE /-->

Latest revision as of 17:17, 15 March 2018

M204.2033  "in order" not valid on remote file

An In Order clause was coded on a For loop that is in remote file context. PQO does not support the In Order clause.

Response: Correct the program. Use Sort Record keys to obtain the desired ordering.

Message attributes:

RETCODEO=0Sets online return code
RETCODEB=4Sets batch (single user) return code
CLASS=EError class; the message can be suppressed with the X'04' bit setting of the MSGCTL parameter
AUDITERWrites the message with line type ER to the audit trail
COUNTIncrements the error count (ERCNT) parameter

Back to list of messages