MSIR.0901 Can't define IODEVs with TNDEV number in CCAIN stream: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The TNDEV parameter was set in the user0 parameters and then one or more IODEV cards were specified for the IODEV number indicated by the TNDEV parameter. Since sdaemon threads h...") |
(Automatically generated page update) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The TNDEV parameter was set in the user0 parameters and then one or more IODEV cards were specified for the IODEV number indicated by the TNDEV parameter. Since sdaemon threads have their IODEV numbers dynamically changed to the TNDEV value when a telnet connection is made, no IODEV cards are required or allowed for the TNDEV value. If the IODEV cards were in the CCAIN stream before the TNDEV parameter was added to the stream, the number chosen for TNDEV was clearly a poor choice, as it was already in use for something else. The recommended value for TNDEV is 21. | The TNDEV parameter was set in the user0 parameters and then one or more IODEV cards were specified for the IODEV number indicated by the TNDEV parameter. Since sdaemon threads have their IODEV numbers dynamically changed to the TNDEV value when a telnet connection is made, no IODEV cards are required or allowed for the TNDEV value. If the IODEV cards were in the CCAIN stream before the TNDEV parameter was added to the stream, the number chosen for TNDEV was clearly a poor choice, as it was already in use for something else. The recommended value for TNDEV is 21. | ||
[[Category: | {{Template:MSIR.0901 footer}} | ||
[[Category:MSIR.0800 - MSIR.0999]] | |||
Latest revision as of 23:36, 3 March 2017
The TNDEV parameter was set in the user0 parameters and then one or more IODEV cards were specified for the IODEV number indicated by the TNDEV parameter. Since sdaemon threads have their IODEV numbers dynamically changed to the TNDEV value when a telnet connection is made, no IODEV cards are required or allowed for the TNDEV value. If the IODEV cards were in the CCAIN stream before the TNDEV parameter was added to the stream, the number chosen for TNDEV was clearly a poor choice, as it was already in use for something else. The recommended value for TNDEV is 21.
Message attributes:
| RETCODEO=0 | Sets online return code |
|---|---|
| RETCODEB=4 | Sets batch (single user) return code |
| CLASS=E | Error class; the message can be suppressed with the X'04' bit setting of the MSGCTL parameter |
| AUDITER | Writes the message with line type ER to the audit trail |
| COUNT | Increments the error count (ERCNT) parameter |
| NOTERM | Does not display the message on the user's terminal |